What she didn’t realize is that by doing that, she admitted that game is in fact a form of pandering to women. She admits that game is a way of boosting the ego of women whom you have no chance of fucking. By contrasting game and anti-game as the method of “getting laid without pandering”, she’s admitting that game is in fact a form of pandering to women. This is why women support game once they learn more about it. Most women who are anti-game don’t know shit about it and are only against game out of some knee-jerk reaction. The more women learn about game (susan walsh et al), the more they realize game is just a way of exploiting men’s sexuality while maintaining plausible deniability. It’s a way of getting men to raise random women’s egos and pander to them, while having the guy believe he’s “controlling the woman”. It’s the most ingenious device the matriarchy is yet to invent. It gets you to pander, while believing you’re not – BRILLIANT! https://single-ladies.linkman.be https://single-ladies.sceneone.nl/ https://single-ladies.rosadoc.be/ https://single-ladies.eurolines.nl/ https://single-ladies.worldconnection.nl/ https://single-ladies.kompasoutdoor.nl/ https://single-ladies.de-vitrine.be/ https://single-ladies.zibb.nl/ https://single-ladies.startdigitaal.nl/ https://single-ladies.come2me.nl/ https://single-ladies.nvp-plaza.nl/ https://single-ladies.startring.nl/ https://single-ladies.actiefzoeken.nl/ https://single-ladies.overzichtje.nl/ https://single-ladies.wheremyfriends.be/ https://single-ladies.webmastercity.nl